Skip to content
narrow screen wide screen auto screen Increase font size Decrease font size Default font size blue color orange color green color

Stornoway Port Authority

Cruise Ship Schedule 2012

ETA of Visiting Cruise Ships

SPA Strategic Plan

DOWNLOAD HERE

icon SPA Strategic Plan 2011 - 2021 (3.69 MB)

Quick Links

Scottish Ferries Review: Public Consultation 2010 Questionnaire PDF

Preliminary Question:  We know that different communities across Scotland often view their ferry services very differently, sometimes for reasons which are specific to the local area.  If you would like to enter your postcode in the box below, that will help us to make the best use of the information you provide to us in this questionnaire.

 

Postcode:

HS1 2XS

 

Consultation Question  1: Do you agree that a change is required, to improve consistency in provision and secure funding for the future?

Yes  R                 No

Comments:

Change is required in order to increase the amount of investment and to improve efficiency. Current funding has not allowed ports to re-invest in, or replace infrastructure timeously leading to greater expense in the long run.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consultation Question  2: Do you think that harbours should be self funded through harbour dues or do you think the current system of funding improvements through grants should continue?

self-funded                    funded through grants  R

Comments:

The increase in dues that would be required would lead to collapse of harbour business as users would be unable to pay - defeating the purpose of the exercise.

 

 

 

Consultation Question  3: How much of the funding should come from the users of the service?

Comments:

Sufficient to cover revenue costs with a maximum of 25% of capital works

38% of total (consistent with users of air services per HIAL)

 

 

 

Consultation Question  4: Do you agree that we should test the market by tendering some routes on a single basis with the option for the operator to bring their own vessel(s)?

Yes                     No  R

Comments:

Single routes with own vessels means less opportunity to fill in for vessels that are taken off routes for service, repair or maintenance (e.g. recent Clansman issues).

 

If routes Must be split then split between sheltered water and open water routes as they use different types of vessels.

 

 

 

 

 

Consultation Question  5: Do you agree that the following routes are the correct routes to consider tendering as single routes?

Ardrossan - Brodick                  Yes                     No  R

Wemyss Bay - Rothesay          Yes                      No  R

Oban - Craignure                      Yes                      No  R

Largs - Cumbrae                       Yes                      No  R

Pentland Firth                            Yes                      No  R

Comments:

 

NO. See above response to Question 4

 

 

 

 

Consultation Question  6: Should we allow single routes to be tendered as a bundle or should we stagger the tenders?

allow a bundle  R                  stagger the tenders

Comments:

 

If they absolutely MUST be tendered then tender as a bundle so there is some chance of scaling for efficiencies.

 

 

 

 

Consultation Question  7: Should the remaining routes stay within 2 bundles?

Yes                     No  R

Comments:

 

One bundle would allow for a larger pool of resources and greater economies of scale.

 

Consultation Question  8: Should we consider the implications of a looser tender, where a minimum level of service is required but where the operator has flexibility to innovate and reduce costs where they see fit?

Yes                     No  R

Comments:

 

Minimum service levels are paramount and must be tied down. Innovation should apply regardless of specified requirements - there is no need to loosen tender requirements to achieve innovation.

 

Consultation Question  9: Should we specify climate change objectives within the tender and require the operator to specify how he intends to meet them?  Do operators agree and have views on how emission reductions should be defined?  How would they measure and monitor performance, and demonstrate delivery?

Comments:

NO. These are largely lifeline services and, as such, climate change has a much lower priority than service delivery. In any event international shipping is the market area that has the major impact on climate and it is here that technological advances to help meet climate change objectives should be tested before being cascaded down to inshore ferry fleets.

 

Consultation Question  10: What else do you think should be specified in a tender document? E.g. accessibility requirements, integration requirements etc.

Comments:

This begs the question what is in the existing tender documents?

Reliability requirements must be included

Cover for breakdowns should also be included so that tenderers are required to maintain the service in the event of a breakdown.

Penalties for non-compliance should also be included with penalty payments being made both to relevant harbour authorities so that affected communities receive recompense for failures (for example when lifeline freight deliveries have failed and shop shelves are empty) and to ferry passengers by way of compensation in the same way as rail and air passengers currently receive compensation for delays.

 

Consultation Question  11: What should be the rationale for, and purpose of, the fares policy?

PLEASE TICK ONE BOX ONLY

(a) Fairness of fares across Scotland

 (b) Community sustainability

 (c) Supporting economic development

 (d) Supporting tourism

 (e) Supporting the particular need of the particular community R

 (f) Reduce the cost to government

 (g) To manage demand on ferries i.e. a policy that encourages people to travel at different times

 (h) To support “low carbon” travel

 (i) Other

 

Comments:

 

This should have been a ranking exercise rather than a "one choice only"

 

 

 

 

Consultation Question  12: To what extent should fares differentiate between islanders/residents of peninsular communities and other ferry users?

Comments:

 

The Outer Hebrides have seen that the benefit of RET, which applies without differentiation, is that it attracts visitors to the islands and differentiation in fares could negatively impact this.

 

 

 

 

 

 Consultation Question  13: Should there be one fares policy across all of the supported Scottish ferry routes or should there be a different fares policy dependant on the need(s) of the community?

one fares policy                     different fares policies  R

Comments:

 

Some routes have alternatives and others do not. Some consideration should be given to this aspect.

 

 

 

 

Consultation Question  14: Do you agree that there should be a consistent and fair way of deciding what ferry services should be funded?

Yes  R                  No

Comments:

 

Consistent and fair does not necessarily mean parity. Requirements may change as the community in question evolves and parity could block such evolution.

 

 

 

 

 

Consultation Question  15: Do you agree that the ferry service should be designed to meet the most important needs of the community?

Yes  R                   No

Comments:

 

It must be designed to meet lifeline requirements as a priority.

Otherwise the answer depends upon how the "most important needs of the community" are gauged.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consultation Question  16: Is our assessment correct for your community? Please tell us what your community needs are and whether our assessment is right.

Comments:

 

The assessment is correct

 

The community needs a reliable and efficient lifeline service with cover as needed at an affordable cost to users.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Consultation Question  17: Do you agree that investment should be prioritised to those areas that have the most potential to contribute to Scotland's growth?

Yes  R                  No

Comments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Consultation Question  18: Do you think that the responsibility for ferries provision should be more consistent across Scotland?

Yes  R                   No

Comments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Consultation Question  19: Do you agree that it would be wrong for all ferry services to be the responsibility of the Scottish Government?

Yes                     No  R

Comments:

 

Ultimate responsibility should always lie with the Scottish Government, this in itself ensures a level of consistency.

Day to day responsibility can be delegated in appropriate cases.

At the very least, lifeline services should remain with the Scottish Government

 

 

 

 

 Consultation Question  20: Do you agree that the Scottish Government should become responsible for all ferry services providing necessary transport links for island communities to access the mainland and Local Authorities or Regional Transport Partnerships should be responsible for the provision of all others?.

Yes                     No  R

Comments:

 

No. This again limits the potential of pooling resources.

In the Outer Hebrides the Local Authority transferred ferry services when they grew beyond their resource capabilities.

Regional transport Partnerships were not set up to deal with this level of responsibility so in their current form they are absolutely the wrong vehicle to delegate responsibility to.

 

 

 

 Consultation Question 21: Question 20 assumes that where an island is attached to the mainland via a bridge, it is treated as the mainland. Do you agree this is the correct way forward?

Yes                     No  R

Comments:

 

The bridge may be closed leaving the community once again on an island. There needs to be consideration of the consequences of this. It should only be considered mainland where there is alternative routes if the bridge is closed.

 

 Consultation Question  22: Do you agree that the provision of ferry services would be better placed within the remit of Local Government?

Yes                     No  þ

Comments:

 

Local Authority would have a lack of focus, with too many competing priorities.

 

Per comments at question 20, in the Outer Hebrides the local authority has already agreed that it is the wrong body to provide ferry services.

 

 

 

 

 Consultation Question  23: Do you agree that Regional Transport Partnerships could play a key role in the procurement of ferry services?

Yes                     No  R

Comments:

 

RTPs were set up to look at bus and rail links - they don't have the expertise to deal with procurement of ferry services.

 

If they did, will they also procure bus, rail and air services?

 

 

 

 Consultation Question  24:How should the responsibility be split between Local Authorities and Regional Transport Partnerships?

Comments:

 

Neither body should have responsibility.

If a partnership is to be  put in place it should be between stakeholders (hauliers, ferry companies etc.).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Consultation Question  25: Do you agree that the provision of ferry services should continue to be split between central and local government?

Yes                     No  R

Comments:

 

Central Government has the resources to maintain the necessary expetise.

 

There is a place for local government with the small routes, however the main lifeline routes should remain with central government.

 

 

 

 

 Consultation Question  26: If a continuation of a mixed responsibility role is preferable going forward (i.e. responsibility continues to be split between Central and Local Government), how should  the split be determined?

Comments:

 

 

"lifeline" vs "convenience" services with central government responsible for lifeline services and local government responsible for convenience services.

 

 

 

 

 

 Consultation Question  27: Should there be a central provision of  procurement expertise? For example, Local Authorities/RTPS could determine what services/vessels they wanted to provide and specify those services/vessels, with a central procurement team purchasing them on their behalf.

Yes  R                   No

Comments:

CMAL already have this expertise.

Central government will be funding this in some form and so they must retain control and the ability to robustly challenge requested specifications.

 

 

 

 

 Consultation Question  28:

(a) Do you think that recommendations A – G (see below) should be implemented now?

 

Yes                     No  R

Comments:

 

Statutory obligations are already being met.

 

 

 

 (b) When tendering do you think these recommendations should be included in any future tender requirements?

 

Yes  R                   No

Comments:

 

Statutory requirements do not need to be specified in detail, they apply whether mentioned or not.

 

 

 

 (c) Are there any of these recommendations that you consider to be of particular importance?

 A. The design of new ferries and harbour/ shore infrastructure should take full account of the DPTAC guidance, for example the provision of handrails, ramps and assistance telephones. Consideration where possible should also be given to their use in smaller ferries and ports.

B. The need for regular, recognised disability awareness training is viewed as a relatively cheap and quick solution in helping to reduce many of the barriers faced Good customer care and assistance by staff is often viewed as the key factor when deciding if ferry travel is possible, practicable or comfortable.

C. Port and ship operators need to plan their communication and information dissemination to take full recognition of PRMs. Audio, visual or other disabilities need to be considered, especially when considering passenger safety.

D. Accessibility information should be readily accessible to PRMs in order to aid journey planning. Where possible websites should be improved to take recognition of the needs of PRMs and make it easier to access this information.

E. Disabled Persons Assistance policies should be developed by all ferry and port operators as a matter of best practice.

F. A policy for those passengers which may require additional assistance which fall outside the general categorisation of PRM, for example people travelling with small children, or heavy / awkward luggage or baggage should be encouraged.

G. Provision where appropriate of some form of left luggage facility which would aid those passengers that are waiting onward travel connections.                    

Comments:

 

Most of these items are covered by statute they all add up to best practice so why is this relevant to a ferries review?

 

 

 

 (d) Are there other issues that should be addressed?

 

Comments:

 

The relative priority weighting given to these issues as opposed to ferry-related issues.

 

 

 

 Consultation Question  29:

(a) Do you think that an Accessibility Improvement Fund should be set up?

 

Yes                     No  R

Comments:

 

Not until infrastructure funding has been properly addressed

 

 

 

  (b)How would this be funded?

 

Comments:

 

 

See response at  (a) above

 

 

 (c) Who would administer this fund?

 

Comments:

 

 

See response at  (a) above

 

 

 Consultation Question  30:

(a) Do you think that an information system indicating the degree of accessibility would be useful?

 

Yes  R                   No

Comments:

 

 

 

 

 (b) Are there any particular aspects you would like to see considered?

 

Comments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Consultation Question  31: How could the reduction of CO2 emissions from ferries be delivered to assist in meeting the potential emissions reductions set out in the Climate Change Delivery Plan?

Comments:

 

Provide new vessels that can meet the climate change delivery plan by way of engine design etc without deterioration in levels of service.

 

 

 

 

 Consultation Question  32: Operators would be likely to appreciate the fuel-efficiency benefits of such a measure.  Would operators be willing to implement such a measure on a voluntary basis?  If not, can they provide suggestions for alternate methods of delivering emissions  reductions?

Comments:

 

This assumes that speed reduction is the proper response to this issue. What about technology advances or simple scrubbers being installed?

 

Per response to question 9, international shipping is the market area that has the major impact on climate and it is here that technological advances to help meet climate change objectives should be tested before being cascaded down to inshore ferry fleets.

 

 

 

 

 Consultation Question  33: Would passengers support longer journey times as part of a CO2 emissions reduction programme?  If not, can they provide suggestions for alternate methods of delivering CO2 reductions from ferries?

Yes                     No  R

Comments:

 

 

Reverting to plain diesel for fuel or installing scrubbers would reduce CO2 emissions